lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:21:40 +0100
From:	Roman Peniaev <r.peniaev@...il.com>
To:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	Roman Peniaev <r.peniaev@...il.com>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/vmap: Add a notifier for when we run out of vmap
 address space

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:37:06PM +0100, Roman Peniaev wrote:
>> > +       freed = 0;
>> > +       blocking_notifier_call_chain(&vmap_notify_list, 0, &freed);
>>
>> It seems to me that alloc_vmap_area() was designed not to sleep,
>> at least on GFP_NOWAIT path (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is not set).
>>
>> But blocking_notifier_call_chain() might sleep.
>
> Indeed, I had not anticipated anybody using GFP_ATOMIC or equivalently
> restrictive gfp_t for vmap and yes there are such callers.
>
> Would guarding the notifier with gfp & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM and
> !(gfp & __GFP_NORETRY) == be sufficient? Is that enough for GFP_NOFS?

I would use gfpflags_allow_blocking() for that purpose.

Roman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists