[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160317141833.GJ23593@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:18:33 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: add file_dentry()
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:15:26AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> Is that correct the ext4-related patches 3/4 and 4/4 are Linux-v4.5 material?
> Not applicable fpr v4.4.y-stable?
4.5 has already been released, but I think these patches are suitable
for the v4.[345].y-stable branch (which I think is the question you
are really asking).
Al, are you willing to push all of these to Linus before the merge
window closes, with a cc to stable@...r.kernel.org? Or I can push
them to linus via the ext4.git tree if I get signoffs/acked-by's from
the VFS and NFS maintainers.
I'll want to do a full a regression test cycle since we're pushing
patches created after the merge window opened, but I consider these
bug fixes and will certainly support pushing them to Linus as far as
ext4 is concerned.
Cheers,
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists