[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160317155928.GB32575@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:59:28 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
pmladek@...e.com, jeyu@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, mbenes@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [v3,1/8] powerpc: Create a helper for getting the kernel toc
value
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:58:42AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> To be honest I think my v6 works well, but I don't have complete confidence
> due to the lack of proper testing. livepatch samples plus some others I wrote
> and I one Petr wrote all work (calling patched from within patched),
I have outlined a failure scenario for you as a reply to v6 ;)
Question to all: would it be feasible to limit the size of a single module's
.text + TOC to let's say 8MB, and place modules at 10MB granularity? Then it
would be unambiguous: exactly iff the high 40 bits of (TOC-LR) are zero, both
belong to the same module.
Torsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists