linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] gadget: Introduce the usb charger framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMz4ku++hi2tXjqvUH7du2tzZ1Vjk7OtHfNuMPrmZ_m9EsOwUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:58:28 +0800
From:	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, r.baldyga@...sung.com,
	yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] gadget: Introduce the usb charger framework

On 16 March 2016 at 20:09, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 19:46 +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> This patch introduces the usb charger driver based on usb gadget that
>> makes an enhancement to a power driver. It works well in practice but
>> that requires a system with suitable hardware.
>>
>> The basic conception of the usb charger is that, when one usb charger
>> is added or removed by reporting from the usb gadget state change or
>> the extcon device state change, the usb charger will report to power
>> user to set the current limitation.
>
> This patch adds sysfs attributes without adding Documentation for them.
> That's bad.

I'll add Documentation for the sysfs attributes in next version
patchset. Thanks for your comments.

-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards