[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56EAE1BD.9040601@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:56:29 -0500
From: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
<galak@...eaurora.org>, <bcousson@...libre.com>,
<tony@...mide.com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <t-kristo@...com>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] pwm: pwm-tipwmss: Update documentation to use empty
range property
On 03/17/2016 10:01 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:51:57PM -0600, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>> Since the PWMSS and its subdevices (eCAP and ePWM) use the same address
>> space then the range property should be empty. Update the documentation
>> to show the correct usage.
> Why does it matter? An empty ranges is generally not preferred.
Someone pointed out that ranges should probably be empty. I
double checked it with what is in the ePAPR doc and based on
the definition it should be set to empty. I also checked
against the am33xx.dtsi and saw that both USB and ethernet
uses an empty value for ranges.
Can you elaborate on why this isn't preferable?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt | 12 ++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt
>> index f7eae77..672fa71 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt
>> @@ -7,11 +7,9 @@ Required properties:
>> Should set to 1.
>> - size-cells: specify number of u32 entries needed to specify child nodes size
>> in reg property. Should set to 1.
>> -- ranges: describes the address mapping of a memory-mapped bus. Should set to
>> - physical address map of child's base address, physical address within
>> - parent's address space and length of the address map. For am33xx,
>> - 3 set of child register maps present, ECAP register space, EQEP
>> - register space, EHRPWM register space.
>> +- ranges: describes the address mapping of a memory-mapped bus. Its value
>> + should be empty since no address translation is needed between the
>> + parent and the child.
>>
>> Also child nodes should also populated under PWMSS DT node.
>>
>> @@ -23,9 +21,7 @@ pwmss0: pwmss@...00000 {
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> status = "disabled";
>> - ranges = <0x48300100 0x48300100 0x80 /* ECAP */
>> - 0x48300180 0x48300180 0x80 /* EQEP */
>> - 0x48300200 0x48300200 0x80>; /* EHRPWM */
>> + ranges;
>>
>> /* child nodes go here */
>> };
>> --
>> 2.7.0
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists