lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 02:18:27 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	patchwork-lst@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: let caller take the zone lock for test_pages_isolated

2016-03-17 1:49 GMT+09:00 Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>:
> This fixes an annoying race in the CMA code leading to lots of "PFNs busy"
> messages when CMA is used concurrently. This is harmless normally as CMA
> will just retry the allocation at a different place, but it might lead to
> increased fragmentation of the CMA area as well as failing allocations
> when CMA is under memory pressure.
>
> The issue is that test_pages_isolated checks if the range is free by
> checking that all pages in the range are buddy pages. For this to work
> the start pfn needs to be aligned to the higher order buddy page
> including the start pfn if there is any.
>
> This is not a problem for the memory hotplug code, as it always offlines
> whole pageblocks, but CMA may want to isolate a smaller range. So for
> the check to work correctly it down-aligns the start pfn to the higher
> order buddy page. As the zone is not yet locked at that point a
> concurrent page free might coalesce the pages to be checked into an
> even bigger buddy page, causing the check to fail, while all pages are
> in fact buddy pages.
>
> By moving the zone locking to the caller of the test function, it's
> possible to do it before CMA tries to find the proper start page and stop
> any concurrent page coalescing to happen until the check is finished.

I think that this patch cannot prevent the same race on
isolate_freepages_range(). If buddy merging happens after we
passed test_pages_isolated(), isolate_freepages_range() cannot see
buddy page and will fail.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ