[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56EAED30.3040503@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:45:20 -0400
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/10] tpm: Proxy driver for supporting multiple
emulated TPMs
On 03/16/2016 04:42 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 06:54:38PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> +
>> +/* above flags */
>> +#define VTPM_PROXY_FLAG_TPM2 1 /* emulator is TPM 2 */
>> +
>> +/* all supported flags */
>> +#define VTPM_PROXY_FLAGS_ALL (VTPM_PROXY_FLAG_TPM2)
> This can be moved inside the .c-file?
I can move that.
>
>> +
>> +#define VTPM_PROXY_MAGIC 0xa1
>> +
>> +#define VTPM_PROXY_IOC_NEW_DEV _IOW(VTPM_PROXY_MAGIC, 0x00, \
>> + struct vtpm_proxy_new_dev)
> Could we simply replace these four lines with one line:
>
> #deifne VTPM_PROXY_IOC_NEW_DEV _IOW('t', 0x00, struct vtpm_proxy_new_dev);
Does this make it better?
>
> I changed the magic but does it matter?
I would keep the magic at '0xa1'. The documentation is written to '0xa1'
now and seems to be good just as any other.
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists