[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160317180523.GA2619@joana>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:05:23 -0300
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] kernel.h: add to_user_ptr()
2016-03-17 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 14:30 -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > This function had copies in 3 different files. Unify them in
> > kernel.h.
>
> This is only used by gpu/drm.
>
> I think this is a poor name for a generic function
> that would be in kernel.h.
>
> Isn't there an include file in linux/drm that's
> appropriate for this. Maybe drmP.h
>
> Maybe prefix this function name with drm_ too.
No, the next patch adds a user to drivers/staging (which will be moved
to drivers/dma-buf) soon. Maybe move to a different header in
include/linux/? not sure which one.
> Also, there's this that might conflict:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c:#define to_user_ptr(p) ptr_to_compat(p)
> arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c:#define to_user_ptr(p) ((unsigned long)(p))
Right, I'll figure out how to replace these two too.
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists