linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: s3c: Document in binding that only s3c6410 needs a src clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160317223153.GI2831@piout.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:31:53 +0100
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: s3c: Document in binding that only s3c6410 needs
 a src clk

Hi Rob,

On 18/02/2016 at 08:38:53 -0600, Rob Herring wrote :
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:11:06AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > The S3C binding doc says that the RTC and RTC source clocks are required
> > but the S3C driver supports different HW IP and only the s3c6410 needs a
> > source clock.
> > 
> > Fix the binding explaining that the source clock is only needed for the
> > s3c6410-rtc compatible controller.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This patch depends on a previous one that was picked by Rob Herring so
> > this one has to go through his tree again and not through the RTC tree
> > to avoid conflicts.
> 
> Ugg, sent pull request today. It should be in Linus' tree now.
> 
> This can go thru rtc tree if you prefer. Otherwise, I'll queue it up for 
> 4.6.
> 

Do you plan to send that one to Linus for 4.6? Else, I still have a few
patches to send before the end of the merge window.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com