[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160317231128.GB6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:11:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] nmi_backtrace: add more trigger_*_cpu_backtrace()
methods
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 03:55:57PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The RCU stall-warn stack traces can be ugly, agreed.
Ugly isn't the problem, completely random bollocks that puts you on the
wrong path was more the problem.
It uses a stack pointer saved at some random time in the past to start
unwinding an active stack from. Completely and utter misery.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists