[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160318080924.GD13692@x1>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:09:24 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] mfd: intel_vuport: Add Intel virtual USB port MFD
Driver
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Some Intel platforms have an USB port mux controlled by GPIOs.
> There's a single ACPI platform device that provides both USB ID
> extcon device and a USB port mux device. This MFD driver will
> split the 2 devices for their respective drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
This should be at the top.
You couldn't have written the patch before it was suggested.
> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
What is this sign-off meant to indicate?
> Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Why is this here?
a) I don't provide "Reviewed-by:" tags #alarmbells
b) I have never signed this patch off
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++
Seperate patch.
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 8 +++++
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/mfd/intel-vuport.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/intel-vuport.c
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists