linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO bulk changes for kernel v4.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdawWP42O+dy2eJOQXr+aJqpQyRVWLFN5s66EA3wsTEz8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:01:49 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO bulk changes for kernel v4.6

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The end result should be clean but the history is a bit messy.
>
> Gaah. I took the tree, but I didn't realize just *how* messy it was. I
> doubt you did either.

Certainly not. I wasn't even aware that things could be screwed up so
much and still look OK on the surface. I'll certainly be more cautious
about pulling branches in the future.

Yours,
Linus Walleij