lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3287558.oO5rz13nxZ@wuerfel>
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:29:54 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc:	linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
	Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu.Zissulescu@...opsys.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: build: Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized for ARC gcc 4.8

On Friday 18 March 2016 15:50:11 Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Sure, but I prefer this to be only for gcc 4.8 as this warning seems to be
> healthy in small doses  At least it keeps the door open for future discussion
> with gcc guys !

FWIW, testing on ARM with gcc-6.0 -O3, I also get tons of maybe-uninitialized
warnings. It's unlikely that this is architecture specific or fixed in newer
compiler versions.

> The following nested construct actually works - does that look OK to you ?
> 
> ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0408, $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))

Yes, that seems ok.

I don't really understand why -O3 is needed though, maybe it's better to
assume that it won't be needed in future gcc versions and do

ARCH_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0408, -O3 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))

	Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ