[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160318113344.GE7817@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:33:44 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, andihartmann@...enet.de, vw@...mu.org,
labbott@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 02/10] perf/amd/iommu: Consolidate and move
perf_event_amd_iommu header
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:11:01PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39:18AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Yeah, so arch/x86/include/asm/ has all the x86-specific stuff which is
> > not exported to userspace, so moving stuff there makes sense to me.
>
> While the AMD IOMMU is only available on x86 today, there is nothing
> x86-specific in its architecture, so I don't think its header files
> belong to arch/x86.
>
> By that reasoning we could also move all of the intel gpu stuff to
> arch/x86. But we don't do it, because it doesn't make sense and because
> it doesn't belong there.
And according to that argument of yours, we should move everything
which is not too close to the arch it is being used on, to generic
include/linux/. Because it might possibly get used some day by other
arches. Yeah right.
And looking at include/linux - it looks like a dumping ground for
headers. :-\
I guess anything is better than putting non-generic enough stuff in
include/linux/. Maybe drivers/include or something in that direction
would be better...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists