linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:07:17 +0100
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

On 18/03/2016 at 08:57:57 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote :
> >>> But yes, we can at least get rid of the else statement. I don't have a
> >>> strong opinion about the debug information, I left it to avoid someone
> >>> to tell me that I was removing a useful log.
> >>
> >> Although dev_dbg doesn't harm... but isn't driver core printing debug
> >> message already?
> >>
> > 
> > I don't think it does or at least I didn't find it when looking
> > at the devm_clk_get() call chain.
> >  
> >> BR,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> 
> Just to make sure that I understood correctly, there's no action I
> should take in order for this patch to be picked right? IOW, the
> current version is OK?
> 

I was kind of waiting an answer on the question whether the core already
prints a message when probe dereferral happens because in that case,
there is no need for a debug message and we can indeed simplify the
whole block.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com