linux-kernel - Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v3] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:56:08 -0300
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v3] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on
 probe deferral

Hello Krzysztof,

On 03/18/2016 09:20 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Alexandre Belloni
>> On 18/03/2016 at 08:57:57 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote :

[snip]

>>>
>>> Just to make sure that I understood correctly, there's no action I
>>> should take in order for this patch to be picked right? IOW, the
>>> current version is OK?
>>>
>>
>> I was kind of waiting an answer on the question whether the core already
>> prints a message when probe dereferral happens because in that case,
>> there is no need for a debug message and we can indeed simplify the
>> whole block.
> 
> Although I did not test it, I think the core will print generic defer
> message. See really_probe() around line 400:
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/base/dd.c?v=4.4#L347
> 
> However the cause of deferring will not be printed... so I find some
> use of debug message in driver... On the other hand, not many drivers
> are doing this. Ehh, I guess I am just really picky. :)
>

It's Ok, I also have doubts about which direction to take even when
writing trivial patches like $SUBJECT, so I understand the feeling :)

> BR,
> Krzysztof
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America