[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56EC24EE.6020803@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:55:26 +0100
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>, arnd@...db.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pinskia@...il.com,
Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com, broonie@...nel.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, klimov.linux@...il.com,
jan.dakinevich@...il.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com, joseph@...esourcery.com,
christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com,
Bamvor Zhang Jian <bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC5 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64
On 18.03.16 16:49, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:28:29PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
>>
>> For the glibc part, I found that there are 11 patches of ilp32 in top,
>> but the original 28 patches of ilp32 is not in the top, there are more
>> than 900 patches between them(referece the list below). Are you
>> willing rebase all the ilp32 relative patches. It is very useful for
>> reviewing and debugging. I saw andrew request the account in glibc,
>> maybe it has already been in processs?).
>>
>
> I already told there's mess there, and I'd prefer to make things work
> first and then do cleanup.
So how is progress going overall? The last submission I've seen is
already 2 months ago. Are there particular bits holding you up?
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists