[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160318164858.GX6375@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:48:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: Fix output
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:44:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:37:48PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > Would something like this be a better patch?
>
> > -#define pr_fmt(fmt) "NMI watchdog: " fmt
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "Lockup detector: " fmt
You might want to audit all the other pr_ nonsense in that file; a lot
of the msgs don't particularly make sense when combined with the prefix.
Some are for the NMI thing, others for the soft lockup one.
I would just chuck pr_crap() altogether and use sensible text.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists