[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56EC33D5.40008@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:59:01 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: bluetooth: use-after-free in vhci_send_frame
On 03/08/2016, 07:32 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> that means very little to me actually. So is the real issue caused by opening /dev/vhci or is that theoretical one via some internal kernel compile time feature.
Hi, what do you think about this one?
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c
@@ -196,6 +196,11 @@ static inline ssize_t vhci_get_user(stru
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&data->open_timeout);
+ if (data->hdev) {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -EBADFD;
+ }
+
opcode = *((__u8 *) skb->data);
skb_pull(skb, 1);
open_timeout could be in progress (raced with us) and _sync cancel
waited for vhci_create_device to actually finish and create the device
the second time.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists