lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:59:01 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
	linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: bluetooth: use-after-free in vhci_send_frame

On 03/08/2016, 07:32 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> that means very little to me actually. So is the real issue caused by opening /dev/vhci or is that theoretical one via some internal kernel compile time feature.

Hi, what do you think about this one?

--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c
@@ -196,6 +196,11 @@ static inline ssize_t vhci_get_user(stru

                cancel_delayed_work_sync(&data->open_timeout);

+               if (data->hdev) {
+                       kfree_skb(skb);
+                       return -EBADFD;
+               }
+
                opcode = *((__u8 *) skb->data);
                skb_pull(skb, 1);


open_timeout could be in progress (raced with us) and _sync cancel
waited for vhci_create_device to actually finish and create the device
the second time.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ