[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077058A6FD6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:51:00 +0000
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/2] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Make Intel uncore modular
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
>
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
> >
> > This patch makes Intel uncore pmu driver modular.
> > By default, the uncore driver will be built in the kernel. If it is
> > configured as module, the supported cpu model can be auto loaded.
> > This patch also cleans up the code of cpu_init and pci_init.
>
> Nice work!
>
> > +static struct intel_uncore_init_fun skl_uncore_init = {
> > + .pci_init = skl_uncore_pci_init,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_uncore_match[] = {
>
> Shouldn't all of these structs be const __initconst?
>
Thanks for the review. I will fix it in next version.
Thanks,
Kan
> Other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists