[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160318204744.GN20028@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:47:44 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, johannes.berg@...el.com,
emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com, linuxwifi@...el.com,
kvalo@...eaurora.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2] iwlwifi: dvm: use
alloc_ordered_workqueue()
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:19:21AM +0800, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
> Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() to allocate the workqueue instead of
> create_singlethread_workqueue() since the latter is deprecated and is scheduled
> for removal.
>
> There are work items doing related operations that shouldn't be swapped when
> queued in a certain order hence preserve the strict execution ordering of a
> single threaded (ST) workqueue by switching to alloc_ordered_workqueue().
>
> WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag is not needed since the worker is not supposed to free
> memory.
I think "not depended during memory reclaim" probalby is a better way
to describe it.
> Signed-off-by: Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com>
But other than that,
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists