[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56ED33ED.5050800@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:11:41 +0800
From: oulijun <oulijun@...wei.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, <dledford@...hat.com>,
<sean.hefty@...el.com>, <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
<jiri@...lanox.com>, <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <gongyangming@...wei.com>,
<xiaokun@...wei.com>, <tangchaofei@...wei.com>,
<haifeng.wei@...wei.com>, <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
<yankejian@...wei.com>, <lisheng011@...wei.com>,
<charles.chenxin@...wei.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] infiniband: IB/hns: add Hisilicon RoCE support
On 2016/3/17 14:43, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:36:38AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> so, I continue to have it.
>>
>> I will continue to bash on your odd codingstyle. Please fix it!
>
> Jiri,
>
> Checkpatch errors is an easiest issue with this patch.
>
> It is full of functions without use, unconnected macros and
> if you replace "hsi" to name of other well known driver, you will get
> same code :).
>
> They need to redesign the whole driver before resubmission.
>
> Thanks.
>
> .
>
Hi, Leon Romanovsky
Firstly, thanks for reviewing.
I have checked the patch v2, surely, some funtions without use and unconnected
macros exist. I have removed it according to analyse. I will leave few marcos as follow:
#define CQ_STATE_INVALID 0
#define CQ_STATE_RESERV 1
#define CQ_STATE_VALID 2
#define CQ_STATE_ERR 3
I thought that these are defined for hardware information. So, I reserved these macros.
In addtion, I didn't completly understand your review as below:
if you replace "hsi" to name of other well known driver, you will get > same code :).
thanks
Lijun Ou
Powered by blists - more mailing lists