linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging: rtl8712: Fixed Multiple FSF address checkpatch warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <41F9AD95-9440-4606-B78B-A74CA684AA9F@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:12:32 +0530
From:	Parth Sane <laerdevstudios@...il.com>
To:	Roger H Newell <newell.roger@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	florian.c.schilhabel@...glemail.com, punitvara@...il.com,
	stillcompiling@...il.com, bhaktipriya96@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luisbg@....samsung.com,
	Larry.Finger@...inger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging: rtl8712: Fixed Multiple FSF address checkpatch warnings

> Fixed Multiple FSF address checkpatch warnings to conform to kernel coding style.
> 
> Parth Sane (5):
>  staging: rtl8712: Fixed FSF address warning in basic_types.h
>  staging: rtl8712: Fixed FSF address warning in drv_types.h
>  staging: rtl9712: Fixed FSF address warning in ethernet.h
>  staging: rtl9712: Fixed FSF address warning in hal_init.c
>  staging: rtl9712: Fixed FSF address warning in ieee80211.c
> 
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/basic_types.h | 4 ----
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/drv_types.h   | 4 ----
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/ethernet.h    | 4 ----
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c    | 4 ----
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/ieee80211.c   | 4 ----
> 5 files changed, 20 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 1.9.1
Hi,
The thing is all these patches are related and have a cover letter explaining changes. But this seems to be a trivial change which is self explanatory.
This should possibly suffice. What do you think?
Regards,
Parth Sane

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (843 bytes)