[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzabMmLzkOJ8+Jm2F43cubwbfMQdrm_YjG8HeP06ppUtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:03:25 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: aio openat Re: [PATCH 07/13] aio: enabled thread based async fsync
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> What would make unlazy_walk() fail? And if it succeeds, you are not
> in RCU mode anymore *without* restarting from scratch...
I don't see your point.
You don't want to be in RCU mode any more. You want to either succeed
or fail with ECHILD/ESTALE. Then, in the failure case, you go to the
thread.
What I meant by restarting was the restart that do_filp_open() does,
and there it just restarts with "op->lookup_flags", which has
RCU_LOOKUP still set, so it would just try to do the RCU lookup again.
But I actually notice now that Ben actually disabled that restart if
LOOKUP_RCU was set, so that ends up not even happening.
Anyway, I'm not saying it's polished and pretty. I think the changes
to do_filp_open() are a bit silly, and the code should just use
path_openat() directly. Possibly using a new helper (ie perhaps just
introduce a "rcu_filp_openat()" thing). But from a design perspective,
I think this all looks fine.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists