[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160320110031.GA30461@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:00:31 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>,
Stefan Koch <stefan.koch10@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb/core: usb_alloc_dev(): fix setting of ->portnum
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:13:34AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
> > With commit 69bec7259853 ("USB: core: let USB device know device node"),
> > the port1 argument of usb_alloc_dev() gets overwritten as follows:
> >
> > ... usb_alloc_dev(..., unsigned port1)
> > {
> > ...
> > if (!parent->parent) {
> > port1 = usb_hcd_find_raw_port_number(..., port1);
> > }
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Later on, this now overwritten port1 gets assigned to ->portnum:
> >
> > dev->portnum = port1;
> >
> > However, since xhci_find_raw_port_number() isn't idempotent, the
> > aforementioned commit causes a number of KASAN splats like the following:
>
> ...
>
> > Fix this by not overwriting the port1 argument in usb_alloc_dev(), but
> > storing the raw port number as required by OF in an additional variable,
> > raw_port.
> >
> > Fixes: 69bec7259853 ("USB: core: let USB device know device node")
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Applicable to linux-next-20160317
> >
> > Changes to v1:
> > - Initialize raw_port with port1
>
> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>
Thanks for fixing it in time, you are right. My patch would let the
device logical port number equals to device raw port number, but it
is wrong for xhci.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists