[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1458527385-3233-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:29:45 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Remove unneded check for regulator supply
The regulator_resolve_supply() function checks if a supply has been
associated with a regulator to avoid enabling it if that is not the
case.
But the supply was already looked up with regulator_resolve_supply()
and set with set_supply() before the check and both return on error.
So the fact that this statement has been reached means that neither
of them failed and a supply must be associated with the regulator.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index e0b764284773..6dd63523bcfe 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
}
/* Cascade always-on state to supply */
- if (_regulator_is_enabled(rdev) && rdev->supply) {
+ if (_regulator_is_enabled(rdev)) {
ret = regulator_enable(rdev->supply);
if (ret < 0) {
_regulator_put(rdev->supply);
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists