lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321092932.2d1dce5a@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:29:32 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Add preempt checks in preempt_schedule() code

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:27:46 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> So no real objection to the patch except this naming.
> 
> It doesn't 'check', it does preempt-latency tracing. So could we rename
> this to something like:
> 
> 	preempt_{dis,en}able_latency()
> 
> or somesuch?

What about:

 preempt_enable_trace() or preempt_enable_trace_test()?

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ