[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321092932.2d1dce5a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:29:32 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Add preempt checks in preempt_schedule() code
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:27:46 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> So no real objection to the patch except this naming.
>
> It doesn't 'check', it does preempt-latency tracing. So could we rename
> this to something like:
>
> preempt_{dis,en}able_latency()
>
> or somesuch?
What about:
preempt_enable_trace() or preempt_enable_trace_test()?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists