[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56EFF83F.7040906@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:33:51 -0400
From: David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
To: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"'ltc-kernel@...yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp'"
<ltc-kernel@...yrl.intra.hitachi.co.jp>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
John Blackwood <john.blackwood@...r.com>,
Feng Kan <fkan@....com>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
Vladimir Murzin <Vladimir.Murzin@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Balamurugan Shanmugam <bshanmugam@....com>,
sysp-manager <cti.systems-productivity-manager.ts@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/9] arm64: Add kernel return probes support
(kretprobes)
On 03/17/2016 08:58 AM, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI wrote:
>> From: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI [mailto:masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>
>>>
>>> The pre-handler of this special 'trampoline' kprobe executes the return
>>> probe handler functions and restores original return address in ELR_EL1.
>>> This way the saved pt_regs still hold the original register context to be
>>> carried back to the probed kernel function.
>>
>> This patch seems not well separated.
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>>> index bd3f233..13d3333 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> +void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
>>> + struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> + ri->ret_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)regs->regs[30];
>>> +
>>> + /* replace return addr (x30) with trampoline */
>>> + regs->regs[30] = (long)&kretprobe_trampoline;
>>
>> So, where is the kretprobe_trampoline? It seems that function is
>> defined in other patch.
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>
>> And what this function is for??
>
> Ah, sorry, this was my fault. Yes, this function is required.
> But this implementation also means there is an asm-based trampoline
> function which should be included in this patch.
>
> David, could you tell me the repository which I can get the latest
> version of this series? I'd like to see the whole code of kprobes/arm64.
>
> Thank you,
>
It can be found in:
http://git.linaro.org/people/dave.long/linux.git
...in the kprobes64-v11 branch.
Thanks,
-dl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists