lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:42:58 -0600
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Juergen Gross" <JGross@...e.com>
Cc:	<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <Douglas_Warzecha@...l.com>,
	<pali.rohar@...il.com>, <jeremy@...p.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	<mingo@...hat.com>, <linux@...ck-us.net>, <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	<chrisw@...s-sol.org>, "Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <akataria@...are.com>,
	<hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] virt, sched: add cpu pinning to
 smp_call_sync_on_phys_cpu()

>>> On 21.03.16 at 13:24, <JGross@...e.com> wrote:
> @@ -758,9 +759,14 @@ struct smp_sync_call_struct {
>  static void smp_call_sync_callback(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct smp_sync_call_struct *sscs;
> +	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();

So this obtains the vCPU number, yet ...

>  	sscs = container_of(work, struct smp_sync_call_struct, work);
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	hypervisor_pin_vcpu(cpu);

... here you're supposed to pass a pCPU number.

Also don't you need to call smp_processor_id() after preempt_disable()?

Jan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ