[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1527132.IQ7eWgKzaZ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:13:59 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, pc@...ibm.com,
shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, anton@...ba.org, mikey@...ling.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Define per_cpu chip pointer to optimize hot-path
On Monday, March 21, 2016 12:52:55 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18-03-16, 20:28, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:
> > From: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
> >
> > "cpufreq: powernv: Remove cpu_to_chip_id() from hot-path" introduced
>
> If the patch is already committed, you should provide its commit id as well.
>
> > 'core_to_chip_map' array to cache the chip-id of all cores. Replace
> > this with per_cpu variable that stores the pointer to the chip-array.
> > This removes the linear lookup and provides a neater and simpler
> > solution.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
> > Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> You are sending this patch and you have updated it as well.. So, you should have
> had your signed-off here.
Right. Plus if you send a patch from anyone else, you should add your
sigh-off to it anyway, even if it hasn't been modified.
So Shilpasri, please resend with your S-o-b and with the ACK from Viresh.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists