[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321103507.3dd01046@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:35:07 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Add preempt checks in preempt_schedule() code
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:11:45 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> So the problem with preempt_enable_trace() is that we just called a
> _notrace(), and while I now know these are two different trace thingies,
> I might have forgotten that in a few days.
>
What about preempt_latency_start() for the disable, and
preempt_latency_stop() for the enable? Make it more like a stop watch?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists