[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321144218.GW6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:42:18 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Andi Kleen (ak@...ux.intel.com)" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] x86/perf/intel/cstate: Sanitize probing
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:19:27PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > - /* Probe the cstate events. */
> > - for (i = 0; i < max_event_nr; i++) {
> > - if (!msr[i].test(i) || rdmsrl_safe(msr[i].msr, &val))
> > - msr[i].attr = NULL;
> > - }
>
> I think we need to update msr[i].attr as well.
> Because in cstate_pmu_event_init we still need it to do check.
Yeah, this is exploding on all sides..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists