[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F0106C.3030200@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:17:00 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] xen: avoid module usage in non-modular
code
On 20/03/16 00:23, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [[PATCH v2 0/5] xen: avoid module usage in non-modular code] On 21/02/2016 (Sun 19:06) Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
>> This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure
>> people don't reference modular support functions in non-modular
>> code. Overall there was roughly 5k lines of dead code in the
>> kernel due to this. So far we've fixed several areas, like tty,
>> x86, net, ... and we continue to work on other areas.
>
> Just wondering if this is still pending for this merge window; Stefano
> had reviewed the two commits he wanted changed vs. v1 and this v2 was
> sent approximately a month ago w/o any further change requests.
Sorry. While I was checking for pending series for 4.6 I accidentally
looked at v1 and saw outstanding comments and skipped it.
I've now applied this series, thanks.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists