linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160321164440.GA1505@katana>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:44:40 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Sricharan <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, architt@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, ntelkar@...eaurora.org,
	galak@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	andy.gross@...aro.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	iivanov@...sol.com, agross@...eaurora.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities


> enabled.  I have patch like below to fix it, but wanted to ask you if it
> would correct to have this in the
> original patch or should I sent a separate fix ? Sorry for the mess on this.

Once a patch is applied, it is in linux-next, so you need to send
incremental patches to fix things.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)