[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321184318.GS25972@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:43:18 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, t-kristo@...com, mturquette@...libre.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: ti: am335x/am4372: Add tbclk to pwm node
On 03/17, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
> Add tblck to the pwm nodes. This insures that the ehrpwm driver has access
> to the time-based clk.
>
> Do not remove similar entries for ehrpwm node. Later patches will switch
> from using ehrpwm node name to pwm. But to maintain ABI compatibility we
> shouldn't remove the old entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
> ---
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Are there any plans to get off these DT_CLK entries entirely?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists