[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1458594439-29666-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:07:19 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...olabs.net,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation,barriers: Mention smp_cond_acquire()
... do this next to smp_load_acquire when first mentioning
ACQUIRE. While this call is briefly explained and ctrl
dependencies are mentioned later, it does not hurt the reader.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 3729cbe60e41..2b5ea9d01a8f 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -430,8 +430,9 @@ And a couple of implicit varieties:
This acts as a one-way permeable barrier. It guarantees that all memory
operations after the ACQUIRE operation will appear to happen after the
ACQUIRE operation with respect to the other components of the system.
- ACQUIRE operations include LOCK operations and smp_load_acquire()
- operations.
+ ACQUIRE operations include LOCK operations and both smp_load_acquire()
+ and smp_cond_acquire() operations. The later builds the necessary ACQUIRE
+ semantics from relying on a control dependency and smp_rmb().
Memory operations that occur before an ACQUIRE operation may appear to
happen after it completes.
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists