linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: reduce CONFIG_SCSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:54:05 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: reduce CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS=y impact by 8k

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:52:32PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24 2015, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> 
> > This reduces the impact of choosing CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS by about 8KB.
> >
> 
> ping? does anyone feel like picking these up?

Please resend them against the current tree.  I'm pretty sure I acked
your appraoch, and if I didn't give you an actualy review I'll happily
do that after a repost.