linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] Documentation: arm: define DT cpu capacity bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160322095022.GA23909@e106622-lin>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:50:22 +0000
From:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@...dia.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	pboonstoppel@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] Documentation: arm: define DT cpu capacity
 bindings

On 21/03/16 17:51, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:24:52PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> 
> > I think this should work, but we have to understand how do we obtain the
> > max frequency of each cluster while parsing DT. OPP bindings are
> > helpful, but AFAIK there are platforms for which firmware is responsible
> > for setting up and advertise available OPPs. I'm not sure if this
> > happens later on during the boot process. We might still be able to use
> > the clock-frequency property in this case, but that might need changing
> > again if the top OPP gets removed/changed.
> 
> > OTH, we might simply want to say that capacity values are to be obtained
> > once the platform is "stable" (no additional changes to configuration,
> > OPPs, etc.). But this is maybe not acceptable?
> 
> How about we just punt and let the cpufreq driver tell us - it can parse
> DT, use built in tables or whatever?  We could even remember the raw
> values and recalculate if it ever decides to change for some reason.
> Until cpufreq comes up we'll be stuck at whatever OPP that we're at on
> startup which may not match whatever we define the numbers relative to
> anyway.
> 

OK, I'll try and see how that can be done.

Thanks,

- Juri

> > Also, I fear that for variants of a particular implementation we will
> > still have to redo the profiling anyway (like we alreaady did for Juno
> > and Juno-r2 for example).
> 
> This sometimes happens either through binning or through board design
> decisions rather than through new silicon so we might be able to reuse.