linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56F116AC.2000704@mm-sol.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:55:56 +0200
From:	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
To:	Pramod Gurav <gpramod@...eaurora.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	vinod.koul@...el.com, okaya@...eaurora.org, architt@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled

On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely
> hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip the bam_init
> for any such platform if DT property is set.
> 
> Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C boards.
> Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA controller.

I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first.


[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/1/113

-- 
regards,
Stan