linux-kernel - Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] ocfs2: sysfile interfaces for online file check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160321180101.60c8ff3b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:01:01 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] ocfs2: sysfile interfaces for
 online file check

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:38:02 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 04:05:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:57:23 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:17:59PM +0800, Gang He wrote:
> > > > Implement online file check sysfile interfaces, e.g.
> > > > how to create the related sysfile according to device name,
> > > > how to display/handle file check request from the sysfile.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@...e.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>
> > 
> > Thanks.  So all of
> > 
> > ocfs2-export-ocfs2_kset-for-online-file-check.patch
> > ocfs2-sysfile-interfaces-for-online-file-check.patch
> > ocfs2-sysfile-interfaces-for-online-file-check-v4.patch
> > ocfs2-create-remove-sysfile-for-online-file-check.patch
> > ocfs2-check-fix-inode-block-for-online-file-check.patch
> > ocfs2-check-fix-inode-block-for-online-file-check-v4.patch
> > ocfs2-add-feature-document-for-online-file-check.patch
> > 
> > have your reviewed-by.  I'll send them on to Linus.
> 
> I'm curious, are the '-V4' patches built on top of the non '-V4' versions?

yes, the -v4 patches bring the base patch from
whatever-version-i-originally-merged up to v4.

> Otherwise though this generally sounds good to me - I have reviewed the
> entire online fsck patch series.

Cool.