lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160322111737.182bd3f9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:17:37 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jubin John <jubin.john@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with Linus' tree

Hi Doug,

Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/mad.c

between commits:

  a4fe1bc16411 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Remove casts of pointer to same type")
  acc17d671c62 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Remove unnecessary parantheses")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  58721b8f8c71 ("staging/rdma/hfi1: Remove unnecessary parentheses")

from the rdma tree.

I fixed it up (the result was like the former) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ