lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160322151333.GA2977@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:13:34 -0700
From:	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To:	Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
Cc:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rui.zang@...el.com,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] devicetree: bindings: let thermal-sensor point to
 other thermal zones

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:55:11AM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:21:53PM -0800, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:09:44PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> > > > The thermal-sensor property of the thermal zone node accepts phandles to
> > > > thermal sensors.  However, thermal zones can be created as an
> > > > +
> > > > +		thermal-sensors = <&cpu_thermal &gpu_thermal &lcd_thermal>
> > > 
> > > This seems inconsistent. Why can a thermal zone only have multiple
> > > thermal sensors when they are thermal zones themselves? Either we assume
> > > that one thermal zone has a single sensor or we assume that it can have
> > > multiple sensors, but this should not depend on the zone being a sub zone
> > > or not.
> > > 
> > > I think the thermal-sensors property should always point to one or
> > > multiple sensors. I see no point in "This property either points to
> > > exactly one sensor or multiple other thermal zones (from which we only
> > > use the temperature)"
> > 
> > 
> > Agreed here. In fact, if we are going to allow thermal zones to be
> > treated as sensors, it means there should be no limits on what you put
> > of there, as long as all items have #thermal-sensor-cells. So, mixing
> > one (or more) regular sensors, with other thermal zones shall be
> > allowed, if we agree in this semantics.
> 
> Eduardo, thanks for the review.  There doesn't seem to be much
> interest in this and I currently have no time to work on it so I am
> dropping this series for the time being.  I'm happy for this to be
> picked up by somebody else (or who knows, maybe I will be able to work
> on it again in the future).

Ok Javi, as this was one of the topics agreed for a change, I will take it over.

Thanks for your help.

> 
> Javi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ