[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP9aT=kS9KPoD4Asa+RMBCLS5rsk973JqdrG7ndSOqvqwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:55:43 +0100
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rbd: use KMEM_CACHE macro
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com> wrote:
> Use KMEM_CACHE() instead of kmem_cache_create() to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 4a87678..70eba86 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -5643,18 +5643,12 @@ static void rbd_sysfs_cleanup(void)
> static int rbd_slab_init(void)
> {
> rbd_assert(!rbd_img_request_cache);
> - rbd_img_request_cache = kmem_cache_create("rbd_img_request",
> - sizeof (struct rbd_img_request),
> - __alignof__(struct rbd_img_request),
> - 0, NULL);
> + rbd_img_request_cache = KMEM_CACHE(rbd_img_request, 0);
> if (!rbd_img_request_cache)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> rbd_assert(!rbd_obj_request_cache);
> - rbd_obj_request_cache = kmem_cache_create("rbd_obj_request",
> - sizeof (struct rbd_obj_request),
> - __alignof__(struct rbd_obj_request),
> - 0, NULL);
> + rbd_obj_request_cache = KMEM_CACHE(rbd_obj_request, 0);
> if (!rbd_obj_request_cache)
> goto out_err;
>
Applied.
Thanks,
Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists