[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ8f0+qQk4QQxyKmwtqnejCDxdjmrZf8480j54YXUTkVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:45:41 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is an implementation of the iterator over phandles
> concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some time ago. My
> approach is a little bit different from what the diff showed
> back then, but it gets rid of the allocation and 'struct
> 'struct of_phandle_args' misuse.
>
> I also converted the arm-smmu driver to make use of the
> iterator. The resulting kernel boots on my AMD Seattle
> system and fixes the warning triggered there. The patches
> now also pass all dt-unittests in my kvm environment.
>
> Please review. Patches are based on v4.5.
Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the series:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists