[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F1AB26.8050200@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:29:26 +0100
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-meson <linux-meson@...glegroups.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Nicolas Saenz <nicolassaenzj@...il.com>,
André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM64: meson: GXBaby (S905) and Vega S95
enablement
Am 21.03.2016 um 23:36 schrieb Kevin Hilman:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>
>> Note: On the Vega S95 I need to change TEXT_OFFSET as follows,
>> in order to avoid the vendor U-Boot overwriting itself (fwiu);
>> for the Mini Mx that's reportedly not necessary.
>
> FYI, the Amlogic P200 dev board also needs this hack with the factory u-boot.
I have meanwhile found that
mkimage -A arm64 -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 0x1080000 -e 0x1080000 \
-n linux-next -d arch/arm64/boot/Image ../uImage
and then using bootm instead of booti works even without the above hack
on the Vega S95. Not a satisfactory solution yet, but better than
patching the kernel in a distro-incompatible way.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists