[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F0B7C3.8070001@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:10:59 +0800
From: "majun (F)" <majun258@...wei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <Catalin.Marinas@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <Will.Deacon@....com>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
<jason@...edaemon.net>, <lizefan@...wei.com>,
<huxinwei@...wei.com>, <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
<liguozhu@...ilicon.com>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
<zhaojunhua@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip/mbigen: fix the IO remap problem in mbigen
driver.
在 2016/3/21 18:29, Thomas Gleixner 写道:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, MaJun wrote:
>> This patch set is used to fix the problem of remap a set of registers
>> repeatedly in current mbigen driver.
>>
>> irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen node definition in dt binding file
>> irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen driver based on the new mbigen node definition
>
> These subject lines are still horrible as they tell nothing about the nature
> of the change. I fixed them up along with the changelogs and applied them to
> irq/urgent. Can you spot the difference?
Yes, after you changing, the subject and change log clearly show why we need to
do this change.
I have learned a lot from you :)
>
> While at it. The config switch for this driver is horrible. It's just in the
> middle of the device driver configs. Why is this configurable by the user at
> all? It simply should be selected by arm64 or some subarch configuration
> there. Please clean that up.
>
will do.
Thanks!
MaJun
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists