linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 0/6] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56F1BD15.4000701@caviumnetworks.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:45:57 -0700
From:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
CC:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/6] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms

On 03/22/2016 11:48 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 06:59 PM, David Daney wrote:
>
>> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>>
>> v15:
>>
>> 	- Make the distance-map node optional (again), if it is not in
>>            the device tree, default values are used.
>>
>> 	- Minor cleanups to of_numa.c as suggested by Rob Harring.
>
> Hi David, all,
>
> Wondering what the status of this patch series is currently?

I haven't seen any feedback on v15.  My assumption was that the relevant 
arm64 maintainers would take some sort of action after the merge window 
quiets down.

In any event, I am happy to make any improvements that may be suggested.

David Daney