linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160323115457.GC17838@8bytes.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:54:57 +0100
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

Hi Rob,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5.
> 
> Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the series:
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Thanks a lot for your fast reply! I guess these patches will go through
the DT tree, or should I carry them in the IOMMU tree? The DT tree
probably makes more sense.



	Joerg