[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56F28A24.5010107@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 20:20:52 +0800
From: oulijun <oulijun@...wei.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: <dledford@...hat.com>, <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
<hal.rosenstock@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <jiri@...lanox.com>,
<ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<gongyangming@...wei.com>, <xiaokun@...wei.com>,
<tangchaofei@...wei.com>, <haifeng.wei@...wei.com>,
<yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, <yankejian@...wei.com>,
<lisheng011@...wei.com>, <charles.chenxin@...wei.com>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support
On 2016/3/23 2:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Kconfig | 10 +
>
> To fit in with the other drivers drop the hisilicon level
> of the directory hierarchy.
>
> Haven't had time to look at the actual driver yet so far, though.
>
> .
>
Hi Christoph Hellwig,
surely, I considered that other drivers will be put into the hisilicon
level of the directory hierarchy. These drivers will support RDMA function which
will be developed for a series of hisilicon chip. Because of the consideration, I drop the
level.
In additon that, i thought that the patch of RoCE driver which supported the base function of RDMA is huge. However,
It is not splitted into patches in form of patchset. I don't put a better strategy that it neither make mistakes
of building and running nor huge.
thanks
Lijun Ou
Powered by blists - more mailing lists