[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160323.142556.2023977823696366302.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:25:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com, kaber@...sh.net,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vlan: propagate gso_min_segs
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:33:52 -0700
> On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 09:35 +0800, Haishuang Yan wrote:
>> vlan drivers lack proper propagation of gso_min_segs from lower device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
>> ---
>
> The plan was to get rid of gso_min_segs, as nothing uses it.
>
> Otherwise I would have included this in my recent patches...
>
> For such a rare 'issue' , we believe ndo_features_check() is better,
> because it does not slow down the fast path.
I'm not aplpying this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists